Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Thomas #684159 v. Hoffman et al
as 2:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Romero Monte Thomas #684159
Defendant:
Nate Hoffman, L. Jurva, Tim Skytta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02489
Plaintiff:
Cesar Romero, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romero v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Cathy Romero
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Romero v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Romero
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grogan v. Bobby
as 5:2022cv00274
Petitioner:
Juan Romero Grogan, Jr.
Respondent:
David Bobby and Warden David Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(Junior) et al v. Canton City School District et al
as 5:2021cv02423
Defendant:
Marcus Wattley, Canton City School District, Canton City School District Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
K.W. (Junior), K.W. (Senior) and L. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Romero v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05730
Plaintiff:
Benny Romero
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins #512603 v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv01029
Plaintiff:
Marquis D. Jenkins #512603
Defendant:
Dijon Jones, Austin Diekevers, Cole Hoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia Vasquez et al v. Medrano USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00975
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Garcia Vasquez, Baltar Hernan Reyes Jacinto, Wilfredo Lopez Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Medrano USA, Inc, Jonathan Diaz and Medrano USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Romero v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05220
Plaintiff:
Robert James Romero
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
