Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shultz v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 4:2026cv00324
Plaintiff:
Dustin Shultz
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated, Ryan Thornell, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Southwest
as 26-20267
Plaintiff:
Michael Berry and Jay Almer
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines Company, Gary Kelly, Tammy Romo and others
Romo v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2026cv02650
Petitioner:
Eliseo Rodrigo Romo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03842
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026at02024
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03449
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford-Howard et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03954
Plaintiff:
Tracy Ford-Howard, Tahreem Rana, Dohel Asencio and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00971
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03759
Plaintiff:
Logan Brown, Laury Martinez, Mallory Anthony and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomsen v. Romo LLC
as 1:2026cv00126
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Thomsen
Defendant:
Romo LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
