Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Taylor v. Riley et al
as 3:2010cv03142
Plaintiff:
Michael D Taylor
Defendant:
Deb Riley, Jack .., Diane .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Schwartz et al
as 3:2010cv00608
Defendant:
Micheal A Schwartz, Lane Cribb and Carter Weaver
Plaintiff:
Ronald Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ambrose et al v. DS Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv07841
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ambrose, Dorothy Ambrose, Dorothy Ambrose and others
Defendant:
DS Corp., Bechtel National Inc. and CH2M Hill Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lillie Lopez, et al v. City of Houston, et al
as 09-20534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LILLIE ANN LOPEZ and JANA YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON, PETER BROWN, SUE LOVELL and others
Green v. Gregory et al
as 1:2009cv03521
Plaintiff:
Ronald Green
Defendant:
Ed Gregory, Marcus Wieting and City of Joliet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez et al v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Lillie Ann Lopez, Lillie Ann Lopez, Jana Young and others
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Peter Brown, Sue Lovell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adderly et al v. City of Atlanta, Georgia
as 1:2008cv02111
Plaintiff:
Clifford Adderly, Wayne Akins, Miriam Alejandro and others
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Greene v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv00610
Plaintiff:
Ronald Greene
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2007cv07518
Plaintiff:
Nona Adams, Michael James Alexy, Carol Arteaga and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
