Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Jones v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
De Los Santos v. Jones, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv01354
Plaintiff:
Lisandro Rubio De Los Santos
Defendant:
Smith Transport, Inc. and Ronald Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jones v. U.S. Bank Trust Company et al
as 5:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust Company and National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
USA v. Jones
as 23-11021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ronald Jones
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15589
Plaintiff:
RONALD JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald Jones, Jr. v. United States Probation Office et al
as 2:2023cv07295
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Probation Office and United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos et al v. Jones, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv05082
Petitioner:
Rosa Stephanie Santos, Juan Capellan Taverez and Edwin Fontanez
Respondent:
Smith Transport, Inc., Ronald Jones, Jr. and Lisandro Rubio De Los Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ronald Jones Junior v. United States Probation Office et al
as 2:2023cv03688
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Probation Office and United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
