Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Serrano Galaviz
as 24-50282
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ruben Serrano Galaviz
Jones v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04064
Plaintiff:
Henry Jones
Defendant:
City Of New York, Saul Quiles Morales, Ruben Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ruben Serrano-Sierra
as 17-41117
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUBEN SERRANO-SIERRA
Lewis v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv03995
Plaintiff:
Chanel Lewis
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Juan Santiago, Ruben Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serrano v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
as 2:2013cv00558
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, FSB
Plaintiff:
Ruben Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
United States of America v. Nouri
as 10-2107
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis M. Nouri, Ruben Serrano, Alain Lustig and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Reza E. Nouri, AKA Reeza E. Nouri
SMART ONLINE, INC. v. SHERB & CO., LLP
as 1:2010cv00244
Plaintiff:
SMART ONLINE, INC.
Defendant:
SHERB & CO., LLP, RUBEN SERRANO, ALAIN LUSTIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Serrano Mojica et al v. El Conquistador Resort and Golden Door Spa
as 3:2008cv01797
Plaintiff:
Ruben Serrano Mojica, Carmen D. Cruz Martinez and Conjugal Partnership Serrano-Cruz
Defendant:
El Conquistador Resort and Golden Door Spa
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Smart Online, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv07960
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Smart Online, Inc., Dennis Michael Nouri, Reeza Eric Nouri and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Cintas Corporation v. Agozzino et al
as 3:2006cv05096
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Vince Agozzino, Ryan Ammon, Rick Arms and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
