Cases 1 - 10 of 77
John Ruda et al v. City of San Luis Obispo
as 2:2026cv02283
Plaintiff:
John Ruda, Shahriar Zarnegar, Jordan Knauer and others
Defendant:
City of San Luis Obispo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00525
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-3247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Perez v. Rudas et al
as 2:2025cv03172
Plaintiff:
Jose Conrado Perez
Defendant:
Robert Rudas, Daram Vasuki and Olsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rudas et al v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
as 2:2025cv02784
Plaintiff:
Consuelo S. Rudas and Robert J. Rudas
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PC) Hopkins v. CDCR Healthcare Services et al
as 2:2025cv00089
Defendant:
Rudas, Surenini, Director of CDCR Healthcare Services and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
