Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shauley (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2026cv02068
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Lee Shauley
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Jessica Dorcey, Anthony Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al (CONSENT)
as 2:2026cv00050
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS BIANCA ADAMS, CHRISTAL DENISE ANGLIN, Christopher Lemont Anglin and others
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Perdue Farms, Inc., Perdue Foods, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
RUMPH v. NJ Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2025cv07102
Plaintiff:
CRAIG RUMPH
Defendant:
NJ Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
LYON et al v. MCAFEE TOWERS, INC. et al
as 5:2025cv00346
Plaintiff:
GENERA11 LYON and CAROL LYON
Defendant:
MICHAEL COLBERT, MACON HOUSING AUTHORITY, CATRINA RUMPH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Rumph & Associates, P.C. v. PM Consulting Group, LLC
as 1:2025cv01293
Plaintiff:
Rumph & Associates, P.C.
Defendant:
PM Consulting Group, LLC doing business as Vistant, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rumph v. Henry Ford Genesys Hospital et al
as 2:2025cv10712
Plaintiff:
Robin Rumph
Defendant:
Henry Ford Genesys Hospital and AFSCME Local 3518, Michigan Council 925
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Robin Rumph v. NLRB
as 25-1078
Petitioner:
ROBIN TONEY RUMPH
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
RUMPH v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
TAVARES RUMPH
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
