Cases 11 - 20 of 1,014
(PC)Hounihan v. Rushing et al
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Hounihan
Defendant:
Rushing and Carranza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Johnson v. Brian Barney, et al
as 24-3287
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BARNEY, JASON JOSEPH, WILLIAM COOL and others
MCCRAE v. PATRELLA et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MCCRAE, III
Defendant:
PATRELLA, TAMARA RUSH, MICHAEL PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSH v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN RUSH
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and RACHELLE BROWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMALLWOOD v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, TAMARA RUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smallwood v. Locklear et al
as 5:2024ct03064
Plaintiff:
Lamarquis Smallwood
Defendant:
Dean Locklear, Ms. Sampson, Tamara Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adrian Riley v. Kris Rish, Warden
as 24-1430
Petitioner:
Adrian Dominic Riley
Respondent:
Kris Rish, Warden--Minnesota Correctional Facility--Rush City
BOYKINS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BOYKINS
Defendant:
S.R.G. CAPTAIN LOCKLEAR, (FNU SCOTT) MS. SCOTT, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O
as 7:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Deunverelle L. Jackson and Deunjerelle L. Jackson
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O, Katherine Rushing and Myriah Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaun Rushing v. Cape Girardeau Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 24-1404
Plaintiff:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau County Sheriff's Department, Officers/Agency and City of Cape Girardeau, Officers Involved
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
