Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,014
Rush v. Burton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff: Cody Allen Rush
Defendant: Kendra Burton and Jammi Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Rayville et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01810
Plaintiff: Glenn Damond
Defendant: City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Tyler Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Jenkins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00066
Plaintiff: Cody A. Rush
Defendant: Brian Jenkins and Jim Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush Holt, III v. Greensville Correctional Center
as 23-7295
Plaintiff: RUSH JACK SAMUEL HOLT, III
Defendant: GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Rush Holt, III v. Ms. Brown
as 23-7296
Plaintiff: RUSH JACK SAMUEL HOLT, III
Defendant: MS. BROWN, PREA Investigator Sergeant
Joseph Saari v. Jesse Pugh, Warden
as 23-3728
Petitioner: Joseph Thomas Saari
Respondent: Jesse Pugh, Warden of MCF--Rush City
Rush v. Berry et al
as 1:2023cv01271
Plaintiff: Cody Allen Rush
Defendant: Rick Berry and Suzanne Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon Polk v. Lopez-Rivera, et al
as 23-14059
Plaintiff / Appellant: VERNON S. POLK
Defendant / Appellee: LOPEZ-RIVERA, V. MYERS, J SLOAN and others
Rush v. Lincoln County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff: Cody Allen Rush
Defendant: Lincoln County Jail, Vicky Afisov, Chris Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rushing v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02577
Petitioner: Theodore Roosevelt Rushing
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?