Cases 61 - 70 of 218
HICKS et al v. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2020cv15575
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA HICKS and STEPHEN HICKS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Segarra Miranda v. Rushmore & RCAC-II, et al
as 20-1916
Appellant:
WILFREDO SEGARRA MIRANDA and WILFREDO SEGARRA MIRANDA, Chapter 7 Trustee
Interested Party:
US TRUSTEE
Appellee:
RUSHMORE & RCAC-II, RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC and ROOSEVELT CAYMAN ASSET COMPANY II
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01779
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv13084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv02028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BLOOM v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2020cv01386
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BLOOM
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01695
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01524
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sealy et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 3:2020cv00431
Defendant:
Corelogic Valuation Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Landsafe Appraisal Services, Inc., Countrywide Financial Corporation, Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Sealy and Shelley Sealy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
