Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Kelly v. Wright et al (INMATE2)(CONSENT)
as 2:2011cv00540
Plaintiff:
Eddie Mack Kelly
Defendant:
Homer Wright , Russell Thomas , Olivia Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00555
Plaintiff:
Russell Thomas
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
David Williams
Defendant:
Russell Thomas, Olivia Pearson, Pike County Jail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lewis Barrow
Defendant:
Russell Thomas and Olivia Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Russell Thomas
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rabbit Ridge Farms, Inc. et al v. Southern States Cooperative et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rabbit Ridge Farms, Inc. , Daddy Rabbit Farms, Inc. and Ron J. Everidge
Defendant:
Southern States Cooperative, Incorporated and Russell Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00201
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Turner
Defendant:
Russell Thomas and Oliva Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv05211
Plaintiff:
Russell Thomas
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Potts v. Thomas et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00974
Plaintiff:
Curtis Potts
Defendant:
Pike County Sheriff Department , Russell Thomas and Olivia Pearson
Cause Of Action: O
Clemon v. Atterberry et al
as 1:2009cv01154
Plaintiff:
Damoni Clemon
Defendant:
John Atterberry, Timothy McCoy, Kenneth Bays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
