Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hilliard v. Guerrero
as 25-40770
Petitioner:
Rusty Lee Hilliard
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hilliard v. Guerrero
as 25-40692
Petitioner:
Rusty Lee Hilliard
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rouse v. Mason County et al
as 3:2024cv05291
Plaintiff:
Rustin Lee Rouse and Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Mason County, Randy Newell, Kevin Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Saldivar v. Superior Court of California, Fresno County
as 1:2024cv00393
Petitioner:
Rusty Lee Saldivar
Respondent:
Superior Court of California, Fresno County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouse v. Hansen et al
as 3:2024cv05068
Plaintiff:
Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Kevin Hansen, David Guidrey, Randy Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05637
Plaintiff:
RUSTY LEE WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hilliard v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2022cv00447
Petitioner:
Rusty Lee Hilliard
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LINGENFELTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09356
Plaintiff:
Rusty Lee Lingenfelter
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
