Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Austin Lightfeather v. Abby Osborn, et al
as 22-2765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Edward Lightfeather, also known as Austin Edward Bower, also known as Austin Edward Gautney
Defendant / Appellee:
Abby Osborn, Legal Counsel, Mental Health Board, of Lincoln, NE, Prescott Place and others
Austin Lightfeather v. City of Lincoln
as 22-2570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Abby Osborn, Legal Counsel, Mental Health Board, of Lincoln, NE, Prescott Place and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Lincoln
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Austin Lightfeather v. City of Lincoln
as 21-1646
Defendant:
Trevor, Dawn, Malinda, Mental Health Board of Douglas, NE, Pierce Bower and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Lincoln
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Lightfeather v. Osborn et al
as 4:2020cv03118
Defendant:
Trevor, Dawn, Malinda, Brenda Mae Stinson, Rusty Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Flauta et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 0:2013cv00327
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc and Janssen Research and Development, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cleo Flauta, Steve Cobble, Al Norooz and others
Miller v. Renville County Sheriff's Department et al
as 0:2011cv02495
Plaintiff:
Rusty Miller
Defendant:
Renville County Sheriff's Department , Doug Pomplun , Daniel Fick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Puckett v. Miller et al
as 1:2007cv00758
Plaintiff:
David Cicero Puckett
Defendant:
Rusty Miller and Clay County Department of Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
