Cases 1 - 10 of 22
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21927
Plaintiff:
VERNON RUSTY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mayer v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
Richard Mayer
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Corrections, Airway Heights Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glen Livermore v. Debra Tonhofer, et al
as 20-35978
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH SAWYER, MD, BRENT CARNEY, DOC Dietary Services Program Manager, NEAL RENDLEMAN, MD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN A. LIVERMORE
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87590
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSTY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Livermore v. Tonhofer et al
as 4:2018cv05075
Plaintiff:
Glen A Livermore
Defendant:
Debra Tonhofer, John Smith, Robert Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rusty Smith Excavating and Paving Co., Inc. v. T. Shaw, Inc.
as 3:2017cv02228
Plaintiff:
Rusty Smith Excavating and Paving Co., Inc.
Defendant:
T. Shaw, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baumann v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2017cv01103
Plaintiff:
Travis Baumann
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Don McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Gregory R Rice
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Washington State Department of Corrections Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv28486
Plaintiff:
Gilberta Smith and Rusty Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geraghty v. Rowse et al
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Troy O Geraghty
Defendant:
Diana Rowse, Mark Bogdan, Robert Rusty Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
