Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CAPODANNO et al v. COUNTY OF ESSEX
as 2:2022cv02777
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAPODANNO, PETER CORBO, ANTHONY DEMEO and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX
W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Co. and Affiliated Companies v. Ryals et al
as 6:2019cv00067
Plaintiff:
W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Co. and Affiliated Companies
Defendant:
John J. Luca and Rachel Ryals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Ryals v. Edward W. Sparrow Hospital Association, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00377
Defendant:
Edward W. Sparrow Hospital Association, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ryals
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
RYALS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv00434
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RYALS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Ryals et al v. MMR Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00531
Defendant:
MMR Constructors, Inc. and MMR Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tony Ryals and Kenneth Ward
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Ryals v. ILA Local 1771 Clerks & Checkers et al
as 2:2014cv00443
Plaintiff:
Cary Ryals
Defendant:
ILA Local 1771 Clerks & Checkers, South Carolina Stevedores Association, Ceres Marine Terminals and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Banks et al v. Alorica, Inc.
as 8:2013cv00985
Plaintiff:
Laquisha Banks , Mary Best , Aubree Burris and others
Defendant:
Alorica, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102 Notice Required Before Plant Closings and Mass Layoffs
Ryals v. Check Into Cash of Texas, LLC
as 4:2010cv00218
Plaintiff:
James E. Ryals
Defendant:
Check Into Cash of Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Ryals v. NMM Holdings, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv61865
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ryals
Defendant:
NMM Holdings, Inc. and Michael Madraymootoo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Quinn et al v. El Paso County
as 3:2007cv00215
Plaintiff:
Kevin Quinn and Marvin Ryals
Defendant:
El Paso County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
