Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Ardito et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03538
Plaintiff:
Chris Ardito, Aaron Giddens, Alex Giasevits-Hios and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
West v. General Motors Company Inc et al
as 1:2025cv01111
Plaintiff:
Carla West
Defendant:
General Motors Company Inc, Crystal Carter and Ryan Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Carter v. Lumpkin
as 23-50673
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ryan Carter
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RYAN CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Lumpkin
as 7:2022cv00007
Defendant:
Ryan Carter
Respondent:
Jerry Sanchez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. City of Fresno, et al.
as 1:2021cv00916
Defendant:
Marces Mendoza, Fresno Police Department, Brian Hance and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. City of Fresno et al
as 1:2021at00629
Defendant:
Marces Mendoza, Fresno Police Department, Brian Hance and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14618
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA RYAN CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan Carter v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
as 5:2020cv01383
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Ryan Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
