Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stallworth v. Brown et al
as 9:2026cv01519
Plaintiff:
John Stallworth
Defendant:
C.O. Leana Brown, C.O. Ryan Dillon, C.O. James Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv01036
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dillon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ryan Dillon-Capps v. Ohana Growth Partners, LLC
as 26-1418
Plaintiff:
RYAN DILLON-CAPPS
Defendant:
OHANA GROWTH PARTNERS, LLC, VICTOR C. BRICK, CEO/Co-Majority Owner, GLENN NORRIS, CFO/Equity Owner and others
Ryan Dillon-Capps v. Ohana Growth Partners, LLC
as 25-1162
Plaintiff:
RYAN DILLON-CAPPS
Defendant:
OHANA GROWTH PARTNERS, LLC, VICTOR C. BRICK, CEO/Co-Majority Owner, GLENN NORRIS, CFO/Equity Owner and others
Dillon-Capps v. Ohana Growth Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03744
Defendant:
Charles A. Bryan, Justin Drummond, Glenn Norris and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dillon-Capps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Acuren Inspection, Inc. v. Dillon et al
as 3:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Acuren Inspection, Inc.
Defendant:
Ryan Dillon, Jesus Villalta, Brian Perry and others
Marshall v. Warren County Regional Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kolona C. Marshall
Defendant:
Warren County Regional Jail, Child Advocacy Center, Detective Jessica Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Dillon v. S. Butler
as 20-5017
Respondent / Appellee:
S. BUTLER, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER RYAN DILLON
Dillon v. Warden
as 6:2019cv00295
Petitioner:
Christopher Ryan Dillon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dillon v. SSP America, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01479
Defendant:
SSP America, Inc. and Does 1 through 25
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
