Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Cody Howard v. Does
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
Cody S. Howard
Defendant:
Does, Classification Personnel, Administrative Personnel, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility
Cody Howard v. North Little Rock Police Department, et al
as 23-2855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody S. Howard
Defendant / Appellee:
North Little Rock Police Department, C Carter, Public Defender and Does, 1-2, Detectives, NLRPD, Prosecutor
Howard v. North Little Rock Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Cody S Howard
Defendant:
North Little Rock Police Department, C Carter and Does 1-2, Detectives, NLRPD, Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody Howard v. North Little Rock Electric, et al
as 23-2748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody S. Howard
Defendant / Appellee:
North Little Rock Electric and Does, Supervisors
(PC) Howard v Unknown
as 2:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Earle S. Howard
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody Howard v. Does
as 23-2308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody S. Howard
Defendant / Appellee:
Does, Classification Personnel, Administrative Personnel, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility
Cody Howard v. Does
as 23-2143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody S. Howard
Defendant / Appellee:
Does, 1-2, Administrator and Pulaski Shift Supervisors, Pulaski County Jail
MARTINEZ v. UNKNOWN
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
NELSON MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MILLER, SGT ANDERSON, UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody Howard v. Keefe Company, et al
as 23-1477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cody S. Howard
Defendant / Appellee:
Keefe Company, Commissary Provider and Does, Pulaski County Commissary Personnel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
