Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Kalvin Coward v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6521
Plaintiff / Appellant: KALVIN DONNELL COWARD, a/k/a Kelvin D. Coward
Defendant / Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, J. A. WOODSON, Warden - Augusta Correctional Center and others
Coward v. Clarke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00177
Plaintiff: Kalvin Donnell Coward and Kelvin D. Coward
Defendant: Harold Clarke, David Robinson, T. Lawhorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Trammell et al
as 1:2021cv00495
Respondent: Marcus Johnson, Michael L. Wade, John Marshall and others
Petitioner: Daniel James Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James El v. Trammell et al
as 1:2021cv00462
Defendant: John Marshall, Bonita R Comer, Michael L. Wade and others
Plaintiff: Daniel James El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coward v. Clarke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00702
Plaintiff: Kalvin Donnell Coward and Kelvin D. Coward
Defendant: Harold Clarke, D. Dameron, S. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv14961
Plaintiff: Karen S. Knight
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation, American Medical Systems, Inc., Carbon Medical Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight v. Social Security Adm.
as 8:2013cv01821
Plaintiff: Harold S. Knight
Defendant: Social Security Adm.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2008cv00077
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00771
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Legal Malpractice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?