Cases 1 - 10 of 91
COOK v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CHARLES COOK, JR.
Defendant:
MERSHON, M. KNIESER, S. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snelson, Jeremy v. Wilson, Derek et al
as 3:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Snelson
Defendant:
Derek S. Wilson, Randal F. Wojciehoski, Daniel Lavoie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. District Attorneys Office et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tyrone E. George
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office, Covarty Criminal/District Courts, Tarrant County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Johnson v. Bailey et al
as 1:2021cv01161
Plaintiff:
Colton Jay Johnson
Defendant:
Mack Bailey, R. Woodson, C Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGrady v. Thompson et al
as 3:2020cv01402
Defendant:
Sgt. R. Brown, Ofc. R. Weems, Lt. S. J. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher McGrady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Bauer et al
as 3:2020cv00802
Defendant:
S. Wilson, Nathan Minard, K. Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maldonado v. Wilson et al
as 1:2020cv00154
Plaintiff:
Alexander Maldonado, Jr.
Defendant:
WCSO, Diana Werkman and Hon. Judge S. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Curran et al
as 1:2019cv07403
Plaintiff:
Harold Curtis
Defendant:
S. Wilson, Ted Uchiek, Jr., Encinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 5:2019cv02119
Defendant:
Tory Ervin, Officer S Wilson, Trinity Food Service and others
Plaintiff:
William Kevin Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
