Cases 1 - 10 of 34
S & D Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 24-1026
Petitioner:
S & D COAL COMPANY and TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KATHY M. BLACKWELL, on behalf of Lonnie R. Blackwell, and Widow of
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
M. B. et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
M. B. and S. D. A.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noramco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lawson v Breckon, et al.
as 1:2021cv00604
Defendant:
Warden Michael Breckon, Doctor Iheanyichukwu Esochaghi and Captian Hicks, S. D
Plaintiff:
Rytholey Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUEEN v. DIETRICH et al
as 1:2021cv00323
Defendant:
S. D. BROWN, D. J. BENOTTI, K. A. DIETRICH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL QUEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEKsystems, Inc. v. Ambar et al
as 8:2021cv00942
Defendant:
Deborah Ambar, Startfinder and S&D Solutions, LLC doing business as Startfinder
Plaintiff:
TEKsystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MERIS v. WILSON et al
as 1:2020cv01109
Defendant:
DETECTIVE S. D. BROWN, CORPORAL A. B. MARTIN and JUDGE EDWIN WILSON
Plaintiff:
CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S&D Enterprises, LLC v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London
as 4:2020cv03248
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Plaintiff:
S&D Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. S-D-R Trucking Incorporated
as 1:2019cv00785
Plaintiff:
Kristi Miller
Defendant:
S-D-R Trucking, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERIS v. MARTIN et al
as 1:2019cv00826
Defendant:
S. D. BROWN and A.B. MASTER CORPORAL MARTIN
Plaintiff:
CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
