Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Aldo DiBelardino v. Jason Miyares
as 24-1269
Plaintiff:
ALDO DIBELARDINO
Defendant:
JASON S. MIYARES, Virginia Attorney General, PETER VINCENT CHIUSANO, MARK S. SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Linda Smith v. US Probation Office N.D. AL.
as 23-13986
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA S. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
US PROBATION OFFICE N.D. AL.
Smith v. US Probation Office N.D. AL.
as 5:2023cv01383
Plaintiff:
Linda S Smith
Defendant:
US Probation Office N.D. AL.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith
Defendant:
MD Carla Rogers, MHM Centurion, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bowling v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, et al
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
daryl bowling
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS), robert green, Annie D. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
DiBelardino v. Miyares et al
as 2:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Aldo DiBelardino
Defendant:
Judge Lilley, Judge Mahan, Judge Frucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
