Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ondrusek v. United States Army Corps
as 23-10892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timpy Ondrusek and Barbara Ann Ondrusek Wolfe
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jonathan S. Stover, District Commander, Fort Worth District, US Corps of Engineers and City of Dallas
Ondrusek et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2022cv01874
Plaintiff:
Timpy Ondrusek and Barbara Ann Ondrusek Wolfe
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jonathan S. Stover, The City of Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lee v. Stover et al
as 3:2021cv00900
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Defendant:
S. Stover, Don Lackey, Wexford Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Resendez v. Wexford Health Care Services, et al.
as 3:2020cv00496
Plaintiff:
Filimon Resendez
Defendant:
Lori Cunningham, S. Stover, Stateville CC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Stover et al
as 3:2020cv00252
Defendant:
S. Stover and H. Ellison
Plaintiff:
Christian Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flippins v. Kink et al
as 3:2019cv00517
Defendant:
K. Kink, Dr. Ritz, Mrs. L. Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Martell Flippins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stover v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01912
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elisheba S. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Bradley v. Klosner et al
as 3:2014cv01571
Plaintiff:
Carl Von Bradley
Defendant:
F. Klosner, S. Stover, D. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Stover et al
as 1:2013cv01424
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Defendant:
S. Stover and J. Benfer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
