Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Davis Jr v. Ticknor et al
as 3:2020cv00762
Defendant:
Maggie Harding, John Barrett, Daniel Hampton and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis Jr and Samuel Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Josephine County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2020cv01006
Defendant:
Josephine County District Attorney, Josephine County Community Corrections, Josephine County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Samuel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Drake et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00400
Defendant:
Mrs. McMullen, Officer Drake, Dr. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everson v. USA
as 1:2019cv00165
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Samuel Davis Everson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2019cv00135
Defendant:
THOMPSON, LINDA VANNETTA, DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2019cv00009
Defendant:
JODEANNA RANEY, ROBINSON, RICHARD YARBER and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Davis v. Kenneth Blackman, et al
as 18-1628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH BLACKMAN, Sergeant, NATHAN DUGGER, Officer, TEDD GOFF, Officer and others
DAVIS v. JIMMERSON et al
as 2:2017cv00389
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DAVIS
Defendant:
DENTAL ASSISTANT, KIM HOBSON, JIMMERSON and others
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. CORIZON et al
as 2:2017cv00388
Defendant:
CORIZON, DENTIST, GRIEVANCE and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. YARBER
as 2:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DAVIS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
YARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
