Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01963
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Kim et al
as 1:2019cv02727
Defendant:
Doctor Kim, Endo Health Solutions, Pfizer and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Noahr
as 1:2019cv02573
Defendant:
Katherine Noahr
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (TV3)
as 3:2019cv00219
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith, Lindsey Sitzlar, Mary Smith and others
Defendant:
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tinkle et al v. Dyer County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2018cv01124
Defendant:
Todd Fawver, Dyer County, Tennessee, Christopher Golden and others
Plaintiff:
Cary Tinkle, Rhonda Tinkle and ESTATE OF CADE TINKLE
Undetermined:
TJ Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Gerrets, et al v. Farrell Lines, Inc., et al
as 16-4269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES N. GERRETS, CORNELIUS BAKKER, WILLIAM G. PALMER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FARRELL LINES, INC., AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INC., AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN LINES, INC. and others
Smith et al v. PPG Industries, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01208
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith and Betty Smith
Defendant:
PPG Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gilbert v. Mason et al
as 1:2010cv00585
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
William D. Mason, Stuart A Friedman, Samuel Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ivan et al
as 1:2007cv02212
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Doctor Ivan, Nurse Veats, Carl Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
