Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,106
Christensen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv05255
Defendant: 3M Company, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crane Environmental, LLC and others
Plaintiff: David Emmett Christensen, Linda G. Christensen and Linda G Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Medeiros, Jr. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv12516
Defendant: SB Decking, Inc. f/k/a Selby, Battersby & Company, PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. as Successor-in-Interest to Akzo Nobel Paints LLC f/k/a The Glidden Company, Bird, Inc. a/k/a Bird and Son, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: Bayer Cropscience, Inc. as Successor to Amchem, Inc., New England Insulation Company, General Electric Company and others
Cross Defendant: Ingersoll-Rand Company, Turner Construction Company, Eugene R. Medeiros, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant: Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant: Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court: Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant: CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Watson-Silver et al v. International Paper Company
as 1:2021cv01356
Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC, Gardner Denver, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Julia Beatrice Watson-Silver, Joseph Silver, Gary Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
In re Toy Asbestos Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00325
Plaintiff: AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Defendant: Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Genuine Parts Company, National Automotive Parts Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WARRINGTON et al v. 3M COMPANY, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03207
Plaintiff: ROBERT M. WARRINGTON, SR. and JOAN M. WARRINGTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY,, ABB, INC.,, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant: HONEYWELL INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. and JERGUSON GAGE & VALVE COMPANY
Cross Claimant: THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dominguez, et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2021cv00927
Defendant: J&H Marine, Crane Co., Parker Hannifin Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Fernando Dominguez and Silvia Dominguez
Intervenor: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, TIG Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cupp v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10168
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, BW/IP, Inc., Warren Pumps LLC and others
Cross Claimant: Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: Ericsson, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Gail Cupp, James Cupp, Jason Cupp and others
Not Classified By Court: Robert B. Collings, Edward F. Harrington and Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2021cv00925
Defendant: J&H Marine, Crane Co., Goodrich Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?