Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Marcel Ingram v. George Dunbar, et al
as 23-1710
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCEL NICOLE INGRAM
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HONORABLE GEORGE DUNBAR, In his indiviudal capacity, THE HONORABLE ERIC DAVANZO, In his indiviudal capacity, JOCOB SMELTZ, In his indiviudal capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walton v. Winkler et al
as 1:2022cv06719
Plaintiff:
Ivan Walton
Defendant:
Ray Winkler, Jonathan Klier, Matthew Schaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INGRAM v. DUNBAR et al
as 2:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
MARCEL NICOLE INGRAM
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE GEORGE DUNBAR, THE HONORABLE ERIC DAVANZO, JACOB SMELTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schaller v. County of Stafford
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
David Charles Schaller
Defendant:
County of Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fogg v. The City of New Rochelle et al
as 7:2022cv03935
Plaintiff:
Malik Fogg
Defendant:
The City of New Rochelle, New Rochelle Police Department, Joseph Schaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Rossiter et al
as 3:2022cv01194
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Thomas Fabrice, Max Jean Baptiste and others
Defendant:
Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Manuel Cidre-Miranda, Francisco Pares-Alicea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
