Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Sparkle International, Inc. v. Earll et al.
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Sparkle International, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher L. Earll, Jeffrey S. Schrader and Cutting Edge Restoration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv13199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Linden v. St. Joseph, County of et al
as 1:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Howard Linden and Howard T. Linden
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ST. JOSEPH, Sgt. Cody Back, Cpt. Kitty Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12421
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Schrader v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02668
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Schrader, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reynolds v. Grenko et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jake Christopher Reynolds
Defendant:
Billy Grenko, Michael Schrader, Erik Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
