Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Michael Scott v. Marc Houk
as 11-4361
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
MARC HOUK, Warden
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Bennie Adams , Stanley Adams , Tyrone Ballew and others
Defendant:
John Kasich , Gary C Mohr , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magnan v. Workman, et al
as 11-7072
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MAGNAN
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and SCOTT PRUITT, Attorney General, State of Oklahoma
Jerry Scoot Heidler v. Carl Humphrey
as 6:2011cv00109
Respondent:
Carl Humphrey
Petitioner:
Terry Scott Heidler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roger Scott v. Charles Ryan
as 11-99002
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER MARK SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Cunningham v. United States of America (INAMTE3)
as 2:2010cv00639
Plaintiff:
Edward Scott Cunningham
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Panetti v. Thaler
as 1:2009cv00774
Petitioner:
Scott Louis Panetti and Scott Louis Panetti
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott Clabourne v. Charles Ryan
as 09-99022
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT D. CLABOURNE
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Scott Panetti v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 08-70016
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT LOUIS PANETTI
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Scott Panetti v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 08-70015
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT LOUIS PANETTI
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
