Cases 1 - 10 of 11
McCleary v. Nelmark, et al.
as 24-3625
Plaintiff:
JAYSEN MCCLEARY
Defendant:
DAVID NELMARK and SCOTT BEATTIE
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Defendant:
DARSHAN KARWAT, POLARIS STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, MARCUS LEHMANN and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
McCleary v. Nelmark et al
as 9:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jaysen McCleary
Defendant:
David Nelmark and Scott Beattie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Dubar v. Brown et al
as 7:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Marian Elizabeth Dubar d/b/a Marian Elizabeth Dubar Estate Living 28 Trust
Defendant:
Christopher M. Brown d/b/a CMB Leland Station LLC, Scott Beatty d/b/a Absolute Self Management LLC and James M. Brodgon d/b/a Simmons Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BEATTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84510
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BEATTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beatty v. Garman et al
as 3:2019cv01802
Petitioner:
William Scott Beatty, Sr.
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General and Mark Garman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Beatty et al
as 3:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Jenkins
Defendant:
Scott Beatty, Emily McKinley and Louisville Metro Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beattie et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
James Beattie and Rocarla Beattie
Defendant:
Carlissa Williams, Scott Beattie, John N Beattie and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
