Cases 1 - 10 of 100
SMITH et al v. MACON-BIBB COUNTY et al
as 5:2026cv00397
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON SMITH and MATTHEW BLAKE FULLER
Defendant:
MACON-BIBB COUNTY, Sheriff DAVID JOHN DAVIS, FREDERICK GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. USA
as 5:2026cv00655
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. Silva Hernandez et al
as 4:2026cv06015
Plaintiff:
Shamichael Scott Davis, Minor K D and Minor M D, Jr
Defendant:
Yordanis Silva Hernandez and Across America Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Johnson v. Davis et al.
as 3:2026cv00481
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara Le Grand, Religious Review Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petty IV v. Pauliskneski et al
as 1:2026cv03469
Plaintiff:
Joseph-Robert Petty IV
Defendant:
Marilyn L Pauliskneski, Scott Davis, George Kanellopolos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Medtronic USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv02898
Plaintiff:
James Scott Davis and Anne Victoria Davis
Defendant:
Medtronic USA, Inc. and Piedmont Walton Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Pipkin v. Colorado City, Town of et al
as 3:2026cv08112
Plaintiff:
Jason Carlos Pipkin
Defendant:
Colorado City, Town of, Hildale, City of, Rachel A Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2026cv00335
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Davis
Defendant:
Stephanie Thomas Jenkins, PIA Law and Clerk of Superior Court for Wake County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riggs v. Davis, et al.
as 26-2142
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HARVEY RIGGS
Defendant:
SCOTT DAVIS, KARA LEGRAND, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
