Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brandon Ramirez v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis-Marion County, et al
as 26-2276
Plaintiff:
BRANDON RAMIREZ
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY, SCOTT HARTMAN, ZACHARY TAYLOR and others
Hartman v. USA
as 2:2024cv12491
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RAMIREZ v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
BRANDON RAMIREZ
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ANTHONY MACLEMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Hartman v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hernando County)
as 8:2023cv02746
Petitioner:
Scott Hartman
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Hartman
as 23-7336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT HARTMAN, MARIO MONELLO, VINCENT PUMA and others
Defendant:
THAE KWEON, THOMAS PINOU and ST. MARK'S WORLD ACQUISITIONS LLC
Morgan v. Hartman et al
as 1:2022cv03501
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Morgan
Defendant:
Scott Hartman, Mario Monello, Vincent Puma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morgan v. Hartman, et al
as 1:2022cv03367
Plaintiff:
Michael Morgan
Defendant:
Scott Hartman, Mario Monello, Vincent Puma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeffrey HartmanIn re: Jeffrey Hartman
as 21-2616
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFREY SCOTT HARTMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hartman v. USA
as 2:2018cv13621
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Hartman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hartman v. Monster Beverage Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00706
Plaintiff:
Scott Hartman
Defendant:
Monster Beverage Corporation , Micah Bingeman and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
