Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Curry v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14017
Petitioner:
David T. Curry
Respondent:
Corizon Health, Inc., George Jorge, M.D., Misty Gaddis, ARNP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANIES v. ARVANTIS et al
as 1:2015cv01977
Defendant:
GEORGE ARVANITIS, KEVIN BUTCHER, SCOTT KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff:
WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Savoy v. Davis et al
as 3:2014cv00700
Defendant:
Daniel Davis, Scott Kennedy, John Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Savoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savoy v. Davis et al
as 3:2014cv00553
Defendant:
Daniel Davis, Scott Kennedy, John Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Savoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Savoy v. Davis et al
as 3:2014cv00540
Defendant:
Daniel Davis, Scott Kennedy and John Sanders
Plaintiff:
Joseph Savoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Briggs v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv05608
Plaintiff:
Alisha Briggs
Defendant:
United States of America, Penny M. Faires and Scott Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Robert Norse v. City of Santa Cruz, et al
as 13-16432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT NORSE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, CHRISTOPHER KROHN, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz, TIM FITZMAURICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
GOLDEN v. MERINGOLLO
as 4:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LADON GOLDEN
Defendant:
COLLEEN MERINGOLLO, SCOTT KENNEDY, DAVID WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
