Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SAMUELS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08808
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SAMUELS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
TANTON v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07507
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TANTON, MARK BAILEY, ANDREW ITO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Samuel v. RemoteMD Medical Services LLC et al
as 2:2019cv12913
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Samuel
Defendant:
RemoteMD Medical Services LLC and Offshore Service Vessels, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Samuel v. RemoteMD Medical Services LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10237
Defendant:
Offshore Service Vessels, L.L.C. and RemoteMD Medical Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Samuel
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Bobbitt et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11886
Plaintiff:
Richard Solomon, Joseph Scattareggia, Kevin Skinner and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv09192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Samuels v. Deschutes County, et al
as 14-35349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SCOTT SAMUELS
Defendant - Appellee:
DESCHUTES COUNTY, DESCHUTES COUNTY SHERIFF, Blanton, TORY FLORY, Deputy, personally and individually and others
King v. Samuels et al
as 2:2013cv04993
Plaintiff:
Lauren King
Defendant:
Morgan Samuels , Scott Samuels , Metlife Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Samuels v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2013cv00516
Defendant:
Deschutes County, Deschutes County Sheriff Blanton, Deputy Tory Flory and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
