Cases 1 - 10 of 40
PRUITT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv04772
Plaintiff:
LEROY PRUITT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FORMER DISTRICT OF PHILA. SETH WILLIAMS SUB NOM, LARRY KRASHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delilah El v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-1697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, MICHAEL NUTTER, JIM KENNEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Heavner v. Burns et al
as 5:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Brent Heavner and Brent Shaun Heavner
Defendant:
Seth W Burns, Thurman Whisnant, City of Hickory, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. WOLF et al
as 2:2021cv02520
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JIYA RABEVETSKY, GOEHRING, RUTTER, AND BOEHM and others
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2020cv09033
Defendant:
SOLF & SOMPSON LAW FIRM, BARRY KNIGHT, PAUL JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUTTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01300
Defendant:
ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY JENNIFER LEONARDIS, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. (unreadable) et al
as 1:2019cv01161
Defendant:
Mike McGloal, Dermont Fishman, Robert Rochwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD v. MANGOLD et al
as 2:2019cv00504
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER GREGORY GILLESPIE, KATHLEEN KANE, SPECIAL AGENT PATRICK MANGOLD and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2018cv05114
Defendant:
RUFUS SETH WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
