Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Parker v. Kraham et al
as 6:2025cv06438
Plaintiff:
Tryn Parker
Defendant:
Aaron Kraham, Sean Eldridge, Edmond Bernabei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Roach et al
as 5:2023ct03070
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Defendant:
Officer Roach, Superintendent Albright, Superintendent Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Bennett et al
as 1:2022cv02619
Plaintiff:
Juan Barnes
Defendant:
Sgt. Bennett, Lt. Wagner and Lt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Charmaine Custis v. Pennsylvania Board of Probatio, et al
as 21-2968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARMAINE CUSTIS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, (PENNA), AGENT GUSE, OF 2630 N 13TH STREET PHILADELPHIA OFFICE and others
Knox v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv00483
Defendant:
C/O Bender, Nurse Rayburn, Ms. Steelhorn and others
Plaintiff:
Ted Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Coleman et al
as 5:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. Hammock, Officer Barkeley, Officer Spiers and others
Plaintiff:
James R. English, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSTIS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE PAROLE/PROBATION BOARD et al
as 2:2019cv03815
Defendant:
SGT BENNETT, JANE DOE, DETECTIVE UNIT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE CUSTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Baltimore County et al
as 1:2019cv02344
Defendant:
Carter, Baltimore County Detention Center, Sgt. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Garrison-Griffis v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00381
Plaintiff:
Angel Garrison-Griffis
Defendant:
Gordon Smith, Deputy William Murray, Detective Sgt. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00952
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
