Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv02053
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN LESLIE LOVERIDGE, CAPT. MILLARD, SGT. COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
LESLIE LOVERIDGE, ELAL CARDE, CAPT. MILLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2023cv01290
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris, Jacob Blake, Bianca Austin and others
Defendant:
City of Akron, Police Chief Stephen L. Mylett, Mayor Daniel Horrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Lincoln et al
as 2:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
John Washington
Defendant:
Wendy Lincoln, Sgt Black, CPS Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: BERWYN STONE
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
BERWYN STONE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPT. OF PRISONS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2018cv00231
Defendant:
Officer Pierre, Sgt. Black and Kevin Sprayberry
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2018cv00165
Defendant:
Ofc. Pierre, Sgt. Black and Kevin Sprayberry
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv10562
Plaintiff:
Carlos T. Wilson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, E. Cruz, K. Thomas, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felton v. Reyes et al
as 1:2016cv04215
Plaintiff:
Joseph Felton
Defendant:
Director Reyes, Superintendant Brown, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Price McCowan v. B Hedrick et al
as 2:2013cv05969
Defendant:
M B Atchley, Officer A Avalos, Sgt Black and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Price McCowan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
