Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Humphrey v. Robinson et al (ASH)
as 3:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Matthew Humphrey
Defendant:
Steve Kennedy, Steve Jones, Brandon Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denzel Franklin v. Deputy Sheriff D. Poindexter et al
as 1:2018cv04015
Plaintiff:
Denzel Franklin
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff D. Poindexter, Deputy Sheriff J. Voight, Deputy Sheriff Warniczek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonin Guzman v. The Orange County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 8:2018cv00199
Defendant:
Sgt Akino, Deputy C Boothe, Deputy Collugan and others
Possibly Aguire:
CSA Name Unknown Female
Plaintiff:
Antonin Guzman
Karrick v. Moore et al
as 5:2017ct03249
Plaintiff:
Luke Michael Karrick
Defendant:
Sgt. Moore, Sgt. Brooks, Ramel Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Thugarella Burgess
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Nsekenene Kolongo, M.D., Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority ("HRRJA") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howes v. Sgt. Moore et al
as 3:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Erlin James Howes
Defendant:
Sgt. Moore, Jane Doe, Arnode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv05693
Plaintiff:
James Roberts
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Director Reyes, Superintendant Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv03506
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Lyons
Defendant:
Cara Smith, Tom Dart, Superintendent Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Schofield et al
as 3:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Xavion L Underwood
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, David Sexton, S Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
