Cases 1 - 8 of 8
REVERS v. UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER , MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION et al
as 2:2022cv01700
Plaintiff:
T. J. REVERS, GERALD PORTO, ANTONINO BALSAMO and others
Defendant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL UNION 1211, ROSS McCLELLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
STONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv30538
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA SHANE STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong et al v. Barrios et al
as 6:2017cv00689
Plaintiff:
Charles E Armstrong, Jr and Vickie Jean Swann
Defendant:
Pedro Barrios, Shane Stone, Anson Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong et al v. Barrios et al
as 4:2017cv00857
Plaintiff:
Charles E Armstrong, Jr and Vickie Jean Swann
Defendant:
Pedro Barrios, Shane Stone, Anson Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Clayton Transition Center et al
as 1:2015cv03688
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Stone
Defendant:
Clayton Transition Center, McCord and Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Shane Stone
as 11-10618
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHANE STONE
Kemmer et al v. David H Arrington Oil & Gas Inc
as 2:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Roy Kemmer, Roy Kemmer, Leta Kemmer and others
Defendant:
David H Arrington Oil & Gas Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Remsburg v. Wilson et al
as 4:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
Daniel Remsburg
Defendant:
Jimmy Greg Wilson, Texas Department of Public Safety, Shane Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
