Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Bridget Sibyl Quintero v. Prime Now LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03382
Plaintiff:
Bridget Sibyl Quintero
Defendant:
Prime Now LLC, Amazon.Com LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Saunders et al
as 7:2021cv00086
Defendant:
Mark A. Saunders and Sibyl A. Saunders
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
BUCHANAN et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03608
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SIBYL BUCHANAN and MITCH PORIS
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Mississippi Bar v. Byrd
as 3:2020ad00005
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Sibyl Caver Byrd
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Ocasio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00792
Plaintiff:
Sibyl Ocasio
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHENZHEN SMOORE TECHNOLOGY LTD. v. A253481482 et al.
as 1:2019cv09895
Defendant:
SMOK_KIT, KEVIN03, DORA68689 and others
Plaintiff:
SHENZHEN SMOORE TECHNOLOGY LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
The Mississippi Bar v. Byrd
as 3:2019ad00006
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Sibyl Caver Byrd
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chouinard v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv07047
Plaintiff:
Sibyl Chouinard
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
