Cases 1 - 10 of 100
SIMMONS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv09271
Plaintiff:
JILL SIMMONS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gray et al v. Simmons Bank
as 4:2026cv00745
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gray doing business as Danagger Resources and TXC Limited LLC
Defendant:
Simmons Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Simmons v. Bickham et al
as 2:2026cv01618
Plaintiff:
Alfred Jones Simmons
Defendant:
Keith Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crisafi v. Palmer et al
as 1:2026cv12511
Plaintiff:
Anthony Channing Crisafi
Defendant:
Sheila Palmer, Travis Simmons, Kevin Hart and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SIMMONS v. USA
as 1:2026cv00710
Petitioner:
LAMONT RAKEEM SIMMONS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
OSWALD v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2026cv04710
Plaintiff:
CORY NOLE OSWALD
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, NADIA ROCABADO-PANOZO and CHAD CONNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Simmons v. Wang & Cortes Dental, P.L. et al
as 8:2026cv02054
Plaintiff:
Mi'Kila Simmons
Defendant:
Wang & Cortes Dental, P.L. and William C Wang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Simmons v. SEMA4.AI, Inc.
as 5:2026cv07451
Plaintiff:
Erin Parisi Simmons
Defendant:
SEMA4.AI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
