Cases 51 - 60 of 2,857
Sloan v. Medical Staff
as 6:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Claude Gene Sloan
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Elad v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Elad
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Joshua Collins, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carolina Landmark Realty, LLC v. Vincent Lineberger
as 23-2159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLINA LANDMARK REALTY, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
VINCENT LINEBERGER
3Rd Party Defendant:
WARREN SLOAN GOFORTH
Sloan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Sloan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sloan v. Court
as 6:2023cv00204
Petitioner:
Claude Gene Sloan
Respondent:
Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bowers et al v. Kelly et al
as 4:2023cv05396
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers and Ginko Bioworks Holdings, Inc
Defendant:
Jason Kelly, Mark Dmytruk, Harry E. Sloan and others
Vernon Polk v. Lopez-Rivera, et al
as 23-14059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERNON S. POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
LOPEZ-RIVERA, V. MYERS, J SLOAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Goodman (Jamarr Simmons)
as 23-7971
Defendant:
JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN, ALBERT SHOULDERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMARR SIMMONS and Sealed Defendant 2
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
