Cases 91 - 100 of 946
Mallouk et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Mallouk, Alfredo Rodriguez Perez and Arjun Dhawan
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Lomax v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2023cv01426
Petitioner:
Matthew S. Lomax
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Workers United
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Short v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Amy F Short
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cardtek International, Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Cardtek International, Inc.
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bodum USA, Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2023cv02946
Plaintiff:
Bodum USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
