Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Douglas DiBiasi v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 12-35583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS J. DIBIASI
Defendant - Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, LESLIE RUFF and HEIDI PARR
Defendant:
SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, OZZIE KNEZOVICH, DAVE REAGAN and others
Murray v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2011cv01365
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murray
503) 224-0155 (fax:
Bruce A. Rubin and Justin C. Sawyer
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Neill v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv00566
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Doug Bayer
Plaintiff:
Erin Neill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Thomas v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2010cv01158
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Thomas
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Douglas DiBiasi v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 10-35213
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOUGLAS J. DIBIASI
Defendant - Appellant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, LESLIE RUFF and HEIDI PARR
Defendant:
SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, OZZIE KNEZOVICH, DAVE REAGAN and others
DiBiasi v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00276
Plaintiff:
Douglas J DiBiasi
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Leslie Ruff, Spokane County Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cheryl Mikita et al v. Laguna Heights Marketplace LLC et al
as 8:2007cv00852
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Mikita, Cheryl Mikita, James Davino and others
Defendant:
Laguna Heights Marketplace LLC, Starbucks Corporation, Crown Hardware Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Gates v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00162
Plaintiff:
Mark Robert Gates
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Jim McDonald, Park Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oriko v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv05230
Plaintiff:
Sheeba Oriko
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Heather Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
