Cases 1 - 10 of 96
BOOZER v. GOURLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00463
Petitioner:
LEE BOOZER
Respondent:
MICHAEL GOURLEY and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BYRD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. BYRD and Al-Tariq Sharif Ali Byrd
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, CHIEF DEPUTY LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. FLAHERTY et al
as 2:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
LAMONT SAMUEL JACKSON and TEASHA YVONNE WRIGHT
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS E. FLAHERTY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS CAULFIELD, OFFICER LARRY HELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth ArnoldIn re: Kenneth Arnold
as 22-2523
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH ARNOLD
Respondent:
DEREK F. OBERLANDER, Superintendent, FOREST SCI, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and others
HAIRSTON v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv00234
Petitioner:
KENNETH HAIRSTON
Respondent:
JAMIE SORBER, GEORGE LITTLE, BOBBI JO SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
COLLINS v. LOWRY et al
as 1:2021cv00084
Defendant:
ADAM BISHOP, SYLVESTER WRIGHT, BRANDON HERRING and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY B. COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PENDLETON v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2020cv01735
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daelon Hill-Johnson v. Michael Catanzaro, Jr., et al
as 20-3083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAELON HILL-JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL P. CATANZARO, JR., WILKINSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and others
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2019cv01398
Defendant:
KARA MARIE SIDONE, ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL P. VEITH and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HEREFORD v. TICE et al
as 2:2019cv01377
Respondent:
ERIC TICE and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA
Petitioner:
ISAIAH HEREFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
