Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Davis v. Bausch et al
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis
Defendant:
Kim Bausch, Chad Page and John & Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. IDOC et al
as 1:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DAVIS
Defendant:
IDOC, MRS. QUICK, MRS. KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Kelso et al
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis
Defendant:
Anne-Marie Kelso , Joshua L Dolton and Margo Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis
Defendant:
Timothy Hopkins, Danielle Hendershot, Victoria M. Gooch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Blanckensee et al
as 1:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
Stephen Davis
Defendant:
B. Von Blanckensee, T. Tomkins and L. Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Von Blanchensee et al
as 3:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Stephen Davis
Defendant:
B. Von Blanchensee, T. Tomkins and L. Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRAGG v. ARTIS et al
as 1:2013cv05577
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
LAWRENCE ARTIS, J. LARKINS, SERGEANT NUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair v. Dhaliwal, M.D. et al
as 3:2012cv00857
Defendant:
Mr. Alan D. Booth, A.W.P., Dr. Stephen Davis, M.D., Mr. Steven DeLaheras, H.S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
John Raymond Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hoslett v. Dhaliwal, M.D. et al
as 3:2011cv00674
Defendant:
Dr. Stephen Davis, M.D., Mr. Steve De Laheras, H.S.A., Dr. Jaspal Dhaliwal, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond James Hoslett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael Daniel Martin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2010cv01319
Defendant:
Dr Stephen Davis, Dr Stephen Davis, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniel Martin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
