Cases 21 - 30 of 90
SANFILIPPO v. OGDENSBURG BOROUGH et al
as 2:2018cv13365
Defendant:
PETER OPILLA, MICHAEL NARDINI, STEPHEN GORDON and others
Plaintiff:
DANA SSANFILIPPO and DANA SANFLILIPPO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. Costa et al
as 8:2018cv01950
Defendant:
Rony Costa and Cheri Costa
Plaintiff:
Stephen Davis, Elizabeth Davis and M. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lifestyles Unlimited, Inc. v. Davis
as 4:2018cv02233
Plaintiff:
Lifestyles Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen Davis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Davis v. Hendrix
as 5:2018cv00018
Petitioner:
Stephen Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Dewayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Leah Ahn v. Priya Sanger, et al
as 17-60082
Debtor:
In re: LEAH AHN
Appellant:
LEAH AHN
Appellee:
PRIYA SANGER, MICHAEL SANGER, PAUL UTRECHT and others
Davis v. Kelso et al
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis
Defendant:
Anne-Marie Kelso , Joshua L Dolton and Margo Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis
Defendant:
Timothy Hopkins, Danielle Hendershot, Victoria M. Gooch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullock et al v. McBurney et al
as 1:2016cv04633
Plaintiff:
Peter Bullock , J. Michael Cantrell , Nathaniel Carpenter and others
Defendant:
Willard B. McBurney , John C. McBurney , Franklin B. McBurney and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Ussery v. Allstate Property and Casulaty Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv13243
Plaintiff:
Nakita Ussery
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casulaty Insurance Company and Tyrone Stephen Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
