Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stephen Sims et al v. Stillwater Insurance Company (JRG2)
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Stephen Sims and Mary E. Sims
Defendant:
Stillwater Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Randolph Bowden v. Stephen Sims, et al
as 14-40791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDOLPH BOWDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN SIMS, RAYMOND HENDRIX, DANIEL BATT and others
Bowden v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2013cv00893
Petitioner:
Randolph Bowden
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Kevin Wheat, Richard Rosenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowden v. Sims et al
as 6:2013cv00891
Plaintiff:
Randolph Bowden
Defendant:
Stephen . Sims, Raymond Hendrix, Daniel Batt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Allen County Indiana et al
as 1:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sue Butler
Defendant:
Allen County Indiana, Fort Wayne City of, Allen Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Riley v. Donna Kazmierczak, et al
as 12-40874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EUGENE RILEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA KAZMIERCZAK, R MORRIS, N WEBB and others
Riley v. Kazmierczak et al
as 6:2011cv00607
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Riley
Defendant:
Donna Kazmierczak, R Morris, N Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. Sizemore, et al
as 08-41115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE GUNN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL SIZEMORE, NEAL WEBB, JOHN MOORE and others
Gunn v. Sizemore et al
as 6:2008cv00321
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Gunn, Jr
Defendant:
Michael . Sizemore, Neal Webb, John Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stephen Sims v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2008cv00435
Plaintiff:
Stephen Sims and Stephen Sims
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and Sysco Food Services of San Diego Inc Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
