Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Steve Williamson, et al v. S.A. Gear Company, Incorporate, et al
as 18-8013
Petitioner:
STEVE WILLIAMSON and RHONDA C. LEMASTER
Respondent:
S.A. GEAR COMPANY, INCORPORATED, AUTOZONE, INCORPORATED, AUTOZONE STORES, INCORPORATED and others
Willaimson v. S.A. Gear Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
Steve Williamson
Defendant:
S.A. Gear Company, Inc., AutoZone, Inc., AutoZone Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmund Abordo v. CCA, et al
as 12-15733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDMUND M. ABORDO
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, TODD THOMAS, Warden, JODY BRADLEY, Asst. Warden for CCA Facility and others
Maluia v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
Sapatumoe'ese Maluia
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Daren Swenson , Todd Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sing v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Cedric Ah Sing
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Todd Thomas, Jody Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maluia v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2011cv00735
Plaintiff:
Sapatumoe'ese Maluia
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Daren Swenson , Todd Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCoy et al v. North Slope Borough
as 2:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Lawrence McCoy , Donald Meany , Richard Patterson and others
Defendant:
North Slope Borough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McCoy et al v. North Slope Borough
as 3:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Lawrence McCoy , Donald Meany , Richard Patterson and others
Defendant:
North Slope Borough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williamson v. Grant et al
as 1:2007cv01147
Plaintiff:
Steve Williamson
Defendant:
David Grant, Duane Urban, Eric Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
