Cases 1 - 10 of 446
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03868
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. M/V Harvey SBISA et al
as 1:2023cv01325
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
M/V Harvey SBISA, Steven Johnson and Florida Marine Transporters, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Carolina v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv01130
Petitioner:
Cornelius Carolina
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDade v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv01035
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lovell McDade, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Hubbard v. Gary Lanigan, et al
as 23-2359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK HUBBARD
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY LANIGAN, STEVEN JOHNSON and RALPH WOODWARD
Defendant:
MARY LANG
Hill v. Loupoursha et al
as 2:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Taurus Clyd Hill, II
Defendant:
Weston Loupoursha, Sam Evens, Steven Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sound Around, Inc. v. Global-Proton LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05429
Plaintiff:
Sound Around, Inc.
Defendant:
Global-Proton LLC, Steven Johnson, Amazon.Com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Carolina v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv00836
Petitioner:
Cornelius Carolina
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. DOE #1 et al
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10254
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON, SETH LACROIX, IVAN MAY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
